IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SREEJITH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i) To call for the records relating to Ext.P4 of 6th respondent and to quash the same by issue a Writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction;
ii) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, direction or order directing the 6th respondent to issue building permit to the petitioners without insisting payment;
iii) To declare that, Note 1 to schedule of The Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland (Regularization of Unauthorized Reclamation)Rules is void, ultra-virus to Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and unconstitutional;
iv) Dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents.
v) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court"
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration before this Court on 19.12.2025:
“Admit.
2. Learned Government Pleader takes notice respondents 1 to 4. Learned Standing Counsel takes notice respondents 5 and 6.
3. In the light of Ext-P6 order passed in a similar matter based on the decision in Abad Builders Private Limited v. State of Kerala [2025 (1) KHC 306), respondents 5 and 6 are directed to process the pe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.