SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6432

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU, J
TRAVANCORE RURAL DEVELOPMENT PRODUCER COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SUDHI SURENDRAN – Respondent
AR NO. 258 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.K.R.RENJU

A fresh notice is essential to initiate new arbitral proceedings after an award has been found unenforceable.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The case revolves around the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, particularly Section 21 regarding notice for initiating arbitral proceedings. Facts of the Case: The appellant provided a loan to the 1st respondent, who defaulted on repayment, leading to arbitration proceedings resulting in an unenforceable award.

Findings of Court:
This court stated that fresh notice is essential for initiating arbitral proceedings after an award is set aside.

Issues: The court framed the issue as whether a fresh notice is necessary to initiate new arbitral proceedings once an award is deemed unenforceable.

Ratio Decidendi: The court highlighted that the execution court deemed the award unenforceable due to unilateral appointment of an arbitrator and ruled that without a fresh notice, further proceedings are premature.

Result: This arbitration request is closed but allows for future proceedings under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

O R D E R

The applicant is a company providing services of technical support, practical assistance and funding assistance to its members for agricultural and non-agricultural purposes. The 1st respondent is a member of the company. He joined in a mutual benefit fund scheme of the company and received an amount of Rs.3,62,500/-. An agreement was executed on 05.01.2017. A copy of the agreement has been produced as Annexure A2. Since there was default in repayment, the applicant invoked the arbitration clause in Annexure A2. Annexure A4 award was passed on 03.09.2018. E.P.No.191 of 2022 was filed to execute Annexure A4 order. By order dated 21.09.2023, the execution court dismissed the E.P holding that the award was unenforceable since the appointment of Arbitrator was unilateral. Thereafter, this Arbitration request was filed to initiate fresh arbitral proceedings.

2. In M/s.Agro Indus Credits Limited v.

Mangalan [2026 (1) KLT 1] , this Court has held that once an award is set aside, to initiate fresh arbitral proceedings, issuing a fresh notice is essential. In the case at hand, the award was found unenforceable by the execution court. In such circumstances also, issuing a fresh notice to initiate arbitral proceedings is necessary.

Therefore this arbitration request is premature. It is accordingly closed. However I make it clear that it will be open to the applicant to issue fresh notice under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act to the respondents and to approach this Court again, if found necessary.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top