IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT TENNIKOIT ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI ,J The present writ appeal, filed under Section 5 of the High Court Act , 1958, challenges the judgment dated 08.10.2025 passed in W.P.(C) No. 34533 of 2025, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant has been dismissed.
2. The only grievance of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the directions contained in paragraph 7 of the order would prevent the appellant from filing an application to appoint the deputed observer for conducting re-elections. Apart from this, the appellant has no other grievance, and he is ready to file an application seeking the deputation of an observer.
3. The learned counsel for the respondent has no objection, but he submitted that if any application is filed by the appellant, it shall be considered in accordance with law. 4. In view of the aforesaid, we are of the considered opinion that this writ appeal can be disposed of with the observation that the appellant shall be free to file an application seeking the deputation of an observer to conduct the re-election, in accordance with law.
5. Any observation made by the learned single judge shall not come in the way of deciding the application, if any, fi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.