A party's right to seek the appointment of an observer for re-elections must be considered without hindrance from earlier court observations.

JUDGMENT

SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI ,J The present writ appeal, filed under Section 5 of the High Court Act , 1958, challenges the judgment dated 08.10.2025 passed in W.P.(C) No. 34533 of 2025, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant has been dismissed.

2. The only grievance of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the directions contained in paragraph 7 of the order would prevent the appellant from filing an application to appoint the deputed observer for conducting re-elections. Apart from this, the appellant has no other grievance, and he is ready to file an application seeking the deputation of an observer.

3. The learned counsel for the respondent has no objection, but he submitted that if any application is filed by the appellant, it shall be considered in accordance with law. 4. In view of the aforesaid, we are of the considered opinion that this writ appeal can be disposed of with the observation that the appellant shall be free to file an application seeking the deputation of an observer to conduct the re-election, in accordance with law.

5. Any observation made by the learned single judge shall not come in the way of deciding the application, if any, filed by the appellant.

With the aforesaid liberty, this writ appeal is disposed of.

Sd/-