IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
K.G. USHA – Appellant
Versus
B. RAGHAVAN – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioners have challenged an order whereby an amendment of the plaint has been permitted by the court below. The respondents sought to file the suit as in forma pauperis. The trial court granted permission. The order was challenged before this Court and this Court set aside the order of the court and directed reconsideration. After remand, the respondents sought amendment of the application seeking to introduce additional pleadings in order to support the plea that the respondents are indigent. Permission granted for amendment has been challenged on the ground that it will be against the order of remand. The counsel places reliance on the direction in the order of remand wherein this Court has said that the matter is remitted to the Sub Court for fresh consideration of the application and that the court will consider all the relevant contentions raised by both the parties along with all factors that are to be taken into account while dealing with an application under Order 33 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure .
2. I do not find any transgression of the direction issued by this Court. It is open to the petitioners to file their objections to the amendment that ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.