Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6445

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
HARITHA S – Appellant
Versus
AYYAPPADAS M – Respondent
TR.P(C) NO. 237 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.MEENAKSHY PARVATHY, SHRI.NANDAGOPAN M.C., SHRI.ARUN T.S., SMT.SREEPARVATHI G.V.

The court can allow the transfer of cases between family courts if no objection is raised by the respondent.

Headnote:This transfer petition seeks the relocation of O.P.No.36 of 2025 from the Family Court, Ettumanoor to Attingal. The respondent did not appear or object to the transfer. The court thus allows the transfer, thereby ensuring facilitation of proceedings in a more accessible jurisdiction.

Result: O.P.No.36 of 2025 is transferred.

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking transfer of O.P.No.36 of 2025 pending before the Family Court, Ettumanoor to the Family Court, Attingal. Even though the respondent has been served with notice, he has not chosen to appear. Apparently, the respondent has no objection to the prayer in the transfer petition.

In the above circumstances, this transfer petition is allowed and O.P.No.36 of 2025 pending before the Family Court, Ettumanoor stands transferred to the Family Court, Attingal.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6445

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMT.R.RAVI, JHARITHA S – AppellantVersusAYYAPPADAS M – RespondentTR.P(C) NO. 237 OF 2025

The court can allow the transfer of cases between family courts if no objection is raised by the respondent.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
HARITHA S – Appellant
Versus
AYYAPPADAS M – Respondent
TR.P(C) NO. 237 OF 2025