SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6451

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
SASHIDHARAN.V. – Appellant
Versus
COCHIN MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 9457 OF 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.P.SATHISAN, SMT.DONA AUGUSTINE
For the Respondents: SRI.ARUN ANTONY, SMT. NIMA JACOB, SRI. K. JANARDHANA SHENOY

Effectiveness of local governance procedures in surveying public land encroachments.

Headnote:The petition challenges construction on public road. Statutory request for a survey by the Municipal Corporation was allegedly ignored. The court directs the survey by the Taluk Surveyor to be completed within two months, leading to legal action if necessary. The final decision emphasizes timely adherence to procedures in local governance.

Table of Content
1. construction on public land needs adjudication. (Para 1)
2. court mandates procedure adherence. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition has been filed on the allegation that the 7th respondent has constructed a building by encroaching upon the public road to an extent of 1.13 cents, in Sy.No.366/4 of Poonithara Village, Kanayannoor Taluk, where he is running a hotel. The petitioner would submit that necessary request was made before the respondent Corporation and thereupon the respondent Corporation has submitted Ext.P2 request in this regard before the 6th respondent – Taluk Surveyor for conducting a survey and report. The petitioner complaints that thereafter no action has been taken in this regard.

2. Taking into consideration the above facts and circumstances and after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned standing counsel for the respondent Corporation and the learned Government Pleader, I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition as follows:

There will be a direction to the 6th respondent to consider Ext.P2 request submitted by the respondent Corporation, who shall conduct necessary survey and the survey report and sketch shall be submitted before the 3rd respondent, without any delay, at any rate, within an outer limit of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The survey shall be conducted with notice to the petitioner, the 7th respondent and any other a Subject to the outcome of the survey to be conducted, further action, if any, in this regard shall be taken by the 3rd respondent, in accordance with law, within a period of three months thereafter.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top