JUDGMENT

Dated this the 30^th day of January, 2026 Petitioner has approached this Court challenging Exts.P8 and P11 orders.

2. It is averred that petitioner has two plots of 4.05 ares each (total 20 cents) in Re.Sy. Nos.76/9/5-1 and 76/9/5-2 of Block No.23 of Marampally Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk. The property was wrongly classified as nilam in the revenue records. However in the final data bank prepared by the respondents as Ext.P2 dated 23.02.2012 the property has been classified as converted land. Petitioner decided to construct a commercial building for which application under Section 27A was filed before the 1st respondent. Reports were called for from the Village Officer. The Village Officer submitted Exts.P4 and P4(a) reports and also Ext.P5 stating that the property is lying as a garden land and therefore a higher fair value has to be suggested instead of Rs.25,000/- per Are reported as per Exts.P4 and P4(a). The Revenue Divisional Officer while considering the application under Section 27A remitted the matter to the Local Level Monitoring Committee to call for a KSRSEC report in respect of the petitioner’s property. Later on, the LLMC based on the said direction by Ext.P8 o