IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
INASU – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR THRISSUR DISTRICT – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court challenging Ext.P4 notice whereby proceedings under the Land Conservancy Rules, 1958 was initiated invoking urgency clause.
2. Petitionersubmits that he was issued with a building permit for construction of a commercial building and while the construction of the building was going on, the panchayat issued Ext.P2 stop memo stating that the construction is encroaching PWD road and they are awaiting report of the 4th respondent. Thereupon petitioner approached this Court by filing W.P.(C) No.14438 of 2016, which was disposed of by Ext.P3 judgment with a direction to respondents 3 to 6 therein to take expeditious steps to survey the boundary of the PWD road immediately and thereafter take a decision in the matter. The specific grievance raised by the petitioner is that without even complying with the direction in Ext.P3, now Ext.P4 notice has been issued as per the Land Conservancy Rules, 1958 directing the petitioner to evict the encroachment. The respondent panchayat has filed a counter affidavit stating that necessary survey has been conducted, but the specific case of the petitioner is that he has not issued any notice regarding the surv
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.