IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SOUVEN SEN, CJ, SYAM KUMAR V.M., J
MURALEEDHARAN P P – Appellant
Versus
KUNNOTH KUNHAYISA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. concurrent findings support eviction due to rent default. (Para 1) |
| 2. claims of tenancy surrender contested based on evidence. (Para 2) |
| 3. court's observation on bona fide requirement highlighted. (Para 3) |
| 4. extension for vacating premises allowed through execution court. (Para 4) |
The concurrent findings of fact regarding default in payment of arrears of rent, reasonable bona fide requirement, and reduction in valuation are now being assailed in this revision petition. Both the Rent Control Court as well as the Appellate Authority, on meticulous examination of the oral and documentary evidence, have recorded findings on all counts in favour of the decree holder.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has tried to persuade us to accept that there had been a surrender in favour of the original tenant and that a fresh tenancy was created in favour of the present petitioner by one Ammed Haji, and relied upon Exts. B1 and B5 in this regard.
3. Both the courts have arrived at a definite finding, based on the evidence, that there has been no surrender of tenancy, as the terms and conditions of the deed of surrender have not been complied with and there is nothing to show
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.