IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, JJ
K.C.BALACHANDRAN PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
RAJALEKSHMI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. validity of the claim for gold ornaments. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's adherence to admissions made. (Para 3 , 4) |
ORDER
Dated : 20th January, 2026 Pratheep Kumar, J.
The appellant in Mat.Appeal 37/2017 filed this Review Petition under Order XLVII Rule 1 r/w Section 114 CPC, praying for setting aside the judgment of this Court dated 24.1.2024 in the above Mat.Appeal or in the alternative to remand the case to the Family Court, Kollam for fresh disposal.
2. The above Mat.Appeal was filed by the defendant in O.S.343/2000 on the file of the Family Court, Kollam against the judgment and decree dated 31.10.2016 directing him to return 43 sovereigns of gold ornaments or its present market value to the respondents/plaintiffs. The Review Petition filed by the plaintiffs in the suit namely, R.P.1245/2023 praying for the inclusion of the claim of 43 sovereigns of gold ornaments which was omitted from the judgment and decree referred to above, was also considered along with the Mat.Appeal and disposed of by a common judgment dated 24.1.2024. As per the above judgment, this Court dismissed the appeal, but allowed the Review Petition and directed him to return the value of 43 sovere
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.