Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
JAMALUDEEN S/O.KADAR PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
SOFIDA BEEGUM D/O.MOHAMMED MUSTAFFA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of claims and court findings. (Para 1) |
| 2. necessity of seeking consequential relief for void declaration. (Para 2) |
| 3. dismissal of appeals due to lack of substantial questions. (Para 3) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.
TUESDAY, THE 20 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2026 / 30TH POUSHA, 1947 RSA NO. 669 OF 2012 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.11.2011 IN AS NO.48 OF
2004 OF SUB COURT, ATTINGAL ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.01.2004 IN OS NO.255 OF 2001 OF MUNSIFF COURT, VARKALA APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT :
JAMALUDEEN S/O.KADAR PILLAI, AGED 63 YEARS, ALUMMOODU VEEDU, ARAKUNNAM, MADAVOOR DESOM AND VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV SRI.J.JAYAKUMAR RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF :
SOFIDA BEEGUM, D/O.MOHAMMED MUSTAFFA, AGED 64 YEARS, SOFIDA MANZIL, PALLICKAL DESOM & VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
PALLICKAL POST 690 563.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
20.01.2026, ALONG WITH RSA NO.667/2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.
TUESDAY, THE 20 TH DAY OF JANUARY
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
