Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
CHEMPAKAKUTTY AMMA MANAKKATTU VEEDU, KARIMULAKKAL MURI, CHUNAKARA VILLAGE – Appellant
Versus
ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI, S/O. SANKARA PILLAI, MANAKKATTU THEKKATHIL VEEDU, KARIMULAKKAL (PO), CHUNAKKARA, MAVELIKARA TALUK – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiffs granted partial title relief, denied absolute title due to puramboke designation. (Para 1) |
| 2. first appellate court modified resurvey records, directing corrections. (Para 2) |
| 3. arguments presented on jurisdiction exceeded and objections to resurvey proceedings. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
J U D G M E N T
O.S No.49/2002 on the files of the Munsiff Court, Mavelikara, is a suit for declaration of title, fixation of boundary and injunction, wherein the plaintiffs were granted a partial relief to an extent of 35.98 Ares of land, whereas, their right to claim absolute title over 98 cents was declined on the ground that a portion of the property was included in the re-survey record as puramboke land. Thus, the plaintiffs appealed before the Additional District Court II, Mavelikara. In appeal, the First Appellate Court found that the plaintiffs had objected to the proceedings of the defendants 1 and 2 as regards the re-survey and also had requested the revenue authorities to correct the mistake in the re-survey. The property was identified through the Advocate Commissioner and also the Surveyor. PW2, the Advocate Commissioner, who prepared the report, supported the fi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
