Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
JOHNY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused is challenging intimidation charges based on fir. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding legal threat. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court analysis of ipc definitions and requirements. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. legal principles relevant for criminal intimidation established. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. court's decision to dismiss the petition affirmed. (Para 17) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 / 15TH MAGHA, 1947 CRL.MC NO. 6155 OF 2022 CRIME NO.1728/2019 OF Angamali Police Station, Ernakulam AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.17 OF 2020 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, ANGAMALY PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
JOHNY, AGED 62 YEARS THETTAYIL HOUSE, VALAVAZHI BHAGAM, ANGAMALY VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683572 BY ADVS.
SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN SMT.N.P.ASHA RESPONDENTS/STATE/VICTIM:
1 STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OFKERALA (CRIME NO. 1728/2019 OF ANGAMALY POLICESTATION, ERNAKULMA DISTRICT ), PIN - 682031 2 THOMAS,S/O. ANTONY, PADAYATTIL, VALAVAZHI BHAGAM, ANGAMALYVILLAGE, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683572BY ADVS.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.P.PRASANTH SMT.S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
