Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
DINESH KUMAR P S – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application filed under bnss regarding apprehended arrest. (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. court's jurisdictional limitations and authority established. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. apprehension of inter-state arrest acknowledged. (Para 7) |
| 4. granting of bail contingent on seeking remedies. (Para 8) |
ORDER
This is an application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS ), 2023.
2. The applicant is the accused in Crime No.1083/2025 of Chengannur Police Station. Alappuzha. The offence alleged against the applicant is punishable under Section 376 of the IPC 3. The applicant apprehends arrest in the above crime.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.
5. It is submitted by the learned Senior Prosecutor on instructions that during the investigation, it was found that the place of occurrence was in Yeswanthapuri in Bangalore and the FIR and other documents were sent to Upparpet Police Station in Karnataka State with the permission of the Hon'ble State Police Chief for further investigation.
6. The Supreme Court in Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023 KHC OnLine 6997) held that though this Court is not in a posi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
