SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6799

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
CHAVAKKAD BAR ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
BAR COUNCIL OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7686 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN, SMT.K.V.RAJESWARI, SMT.RINCY KHADER, SRI.SREEJITH SREENATH, SMT.SUSHAMA DEVI M.
For the Respondents: SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI, SHRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR), SRI.SAJI VARGHESE KAKKATTUMATTATHIL, SRI.K.JAJU BABU (SR.), SMT.AMALENDU A.
SRI.DHEERAJ A.S., GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The withdrawal of a writ petition is acknowledged where no compelling reasons to refuse exist.

Headnote:The court analyzed the petitioners' request to withdraw their writ petition regarding the Bar Association. The learned counsel conveyed the intent clearly, thus permitting the withdrawal. The petition was dismissed as per the request, signifying a conclusion of the matter.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.

Permission is granted. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon Instagram Icon Twitter Icon

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon