SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6799

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
CHAVAKKAD BAR ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
BAR COUNCIL OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7686 OF 2025



Important Points

The withdrawal of a writ petition is acknowledged where no compelling reasons to refuse exist.

Subject

Civil - Writ Petition

Headnote

The court analyzed the petitioners' request to withdraw their writ petition regarding the Bar Association. The learned counsel conveyed the intent clearly, thus permitting the withdrawal. The petition was dismissed as per the request, signifying a conclusion of the matter.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN, SMT.K.V.RAJESWARI, SMT.RINCY KHADER, SRI.SREEJITH SREENATH, SMT.SUSHAMA DEVI M.
For the Respondents: SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI, SHRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR), SRI.SAJI VARGHESE KAKKATTUMATTATHIL, SRI.K.JAJU BABU (SR.), SMT.AMALENDU A.
SRI.DHEERAJ A.S., GOVERNMENT PLEADER

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.

Permission is granted. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top