CHAVAKKAD BAR ASSOCIATION vs BAR COUNCIL OF KERALA

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6799

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
CHAVAKKAD BAR ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
BAR COUNCIL OF KERALA – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN, SMT.K.V.RAJESWARI, SMT.RINCY KHADER, SRI.SREEJITH SREENATH, SMT.SUSHAMA DEVI M.
For the Respondents: SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI, SHRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR), SRI.SAJI VARGHESE KAKKATTUMATTATHIL, SRI.K.JAJU BABU (SR.), SMT.AMALENDU A.
SRI.DHEERAJ A.S., GOVERNMENT PLEADER

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.

Permission is granted. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6799

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JCHAVAKKAD BAR ASSOCIATION – AppellantVersusBAR COUNCIL OF KERALA – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
CHAVAKKAD BAR ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
BAR COUNCIL OF KERALA – Respondent