SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6802

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
V.S.UNNIKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 40689 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: G.SREEKUMAR
For the Respondents: SREEJITH V.S.

The court reinforced the right of society members to petition for dissolution under Section 25 of the relevant Act.

Headnote:The petitioner requested the court for a directive on the application Ext.P4, alleging inadequacies in the management of the third respondent society. Under Section 25 of the Travancore-Cochin Act, the court determined the petitioner's right to petition for intervention. The court concluded to direct the first respondent's officer to consider the application expediently.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for action on society management (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's authority under section 25 confirmed (Para 3)
3. court directed timely action on application (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

Petitioner seeks for a direction to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 by the first respondent.

2. On a perusal of Ext.P4, it is noticed that, a complaint has been filed by the petitioner along with two others before the Chief Secretary, seeking to dissolve the existing Managing Committee of the third respondent- Society, and to conduct fresh elections to the said Society and to initiate steps to approach the District Court, Ernakulam under Section 25 of the Travencore-Cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration Act, 1955 [for brevity, ‘the Act’].

3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader and on a perusal of Ext.P4, this Court notices that under Section 25 of the Act, the State Government or ten percent of the members of the society can move the District Court for dissolution of a society or for framing a scheme for the better and efficient management of the society.

4. Since an application as Ext.P4 has been filed by the petitioner seeking the intervention of the State Government, I am of the view that a direction can be issued for considering the said application.

Accordingly, there will be a direction to the Competent Officer of the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P4 application, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of.

sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top