Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6860
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
M/S. SKYBRICK PROJECTS LLP – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 37753 OF 2024 | WP(C) NO. 5288 OF 2025
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ENOCH DAVID SIMON JOEL, SRI.S.SREEDEV, SRI.RONY JOSE, SRI.LEO LUKOSE, SRI.KAROL MATHEWS SEBASTIAN ALENCHERRY, SRI.DERICK MATHAI SAJI, SRI.KARAN SCARIA ABRAHAM, SRI.ITTOOP JOY THATTIL
For the Respondents: SRI.P.U.SHAILAJAN, SRI.V.VENUGOPAL
Withdrawal of recovery notices eliminates the need for further judicial intervention in the property attachment disputes.
Headnote:In the matter under the Revenue Recovery Act, the petitioners contest the attachment of their property due to loan defaults. The court acknowledges the withdrawal of recovery notices by the Kerala State Industrial Development Corporation Limited, thus necessitating no further action in these writ petitions. The court concludes with the resolution that the writ petitions are disposed of as per the statements made during the hearing.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to attachment order under revenue recovery act. (Para 1) |
| 2. withdrawal of recovery notices by the respondents. (Para 2 , 3) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2026 [WP(C) Nos.37753 of 2024 & 5288 of 2025]
The petitioners in W.P.(C) No.5288/2025 challenged Ext.P5 attachment order under the Revenue Recovery proceedings. By Ext.P5 the residential property of the petitioners is proceeded against for default of Ext.P1 loan. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.37753/2024 challenged Exts.P3 recovery notice and P3(a) attachment order under the Revenue Recovery proceedings. The petitioners state that they are willing to remit the outstanding amount within a reasonable time, if opportunity is granted.
2. When these writ petitions came up for hearing today, Standing Counsel representing the Kerala State Industrial Development Corporation Limited submitted that the dues payable by the petitioners have already been paid and the revenue recovery notices are withdrawn.
3. In view of the afore statement, no further orders are necessary in these writ petitions.
The writ petitions are disposed of recording the afore submission.
Sd/-
