IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
HARI.P. – Appellant
Versus
THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Dated this the 30th day of January, 2026)
The petitioner had availed financial assistance from the 1st respondent Bank in the nature of a business loan. Upon default in repayment, the petitioner was served with a demand notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 . Thereafter, the respondent Bank issued a notice under Section 13(4) of the Act. Consequently, the Advocate Commissioner issued a notice stating that physical possession of the property would be taken on any day within 15 days from 06.12.2025. Aggrieved by the said proceedings, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.
2. On 19.12.2025, this Court granted an interim order staying the coercive steps against the petitioner on condition that the petitioner remits Rs.2 lakhs within one month. It is submitted that the said order has not been complied with.
In such circumstances, the remedy available to the petitioner is to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in South Indian Bank Ltd v. Naveen Mathew Philip [(2023) 17 SCC 311] .
The writ petition is dismissed accordingly.
SD/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.