J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has filed an application under the provisions of Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act , 2007, before the 2^nd respondent herein, contending that the respondent No.7, who is the daughter of the petitioner, is not looking after her, and therefore, the settlement deed executed in the name of the daughter requires to be cancelled. By Ext.P4 Order, the 2^nd respondent, noticing that the petitioner as well as the 7^th respondent are residing together, passed an order that the property transferred as above in favour of the daughter shall not be alienated without informing and obtaining permission of the petitioner herein. It was also directed that the 7^th respondent should also look after the petitioner. Not satisfied with the afore order, the petitioner had filed a further appeal before the 1^st respondent herein, which was disposed of by Ext.P6 Order, noting the stand taken by the daughter that she has no objection to the petitioner herein residing in the property till her death. It is seeking to challenge Ext.P6 issued as above that the petitioner is before this Court.

2. I have heard Sri. M.K. Mohanan, the learned cou