Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6946

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
M.ABDUL KHADER HAJI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 40514 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri.M.ABDUL KHADER HAJI
For the Respondents: SRI.V.V.JOSHI, SRI.JUSTINE JACOB, SMT.SYLAJA S.L., GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Failure to prosecute a case results in dismissal of the writ petition.

Headnote:The court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution, emphasizing legal procedural requirements. The petitioner failed to attend the hearing, leading to the conclusion. As established, the failure to represent results in dismissal of the writ petition.

J U D G M E N T

There is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6946

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMHARISANKAR V. MENON, JM.ABDUL KHADER HAJI – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 40514 OF 2023

Failure to prosecute a case results in dismissal of the writ petition.

Headnote:The court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution, emphasizing legal procedural requirements. The petitioner failed to attend the hearing, leading to the conclusion. As established, the failure to represent results in dismissal of the writ petition.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
M.ABDUL KHADER HAJI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 40514 OF 2023