IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
MUHAMMED SHINOS V.K – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT Dated this the 30th day of January, 2026 Petitioner was appointed as Full Time Menial in the CHM Higher Secondary School, Elayavoor from 21.08.2025 onwards. The petitioner was granted appointment by the 5th respondent-Manager duly taking note of the fact that the petitioner is having mild intellectual disability.
2. The petitioner has registered his name in the District Employment Exchange. Therefore, the appointment of the petitioner may be treated as having been made under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 . Ignoring Exts.P3 and P4, approval to the appointment of the petitioner covered by Ext.P1, was declined by the Educational Officer as per Order dated 23.12.2025.
3. Aggrieved by Ext.P5, the petitioner has filed a Revision Petition before the Government. Ordinarily, Ext.P5 could be assailed only by the Manager filing Appeal before the
3rd respondent through SAMANWAYA. It may take some time and in the meanwhile, the petitioner would be at the receiving end and hence he attempted Ext.P6 Revision Petition before the Government. It is further submitted that any delay in considering Ext.P6 would result in retrenchment of the petitioner. Therefore, pending di
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.