IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
MUHAMMED SALIM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. amicable dispute resolution. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. consent to quash due to non-grievance. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. inherent powers to quash non-serious criminal cases. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
C.S.DIAS, J.
------------------------------------------
Crl.M.C. No. 374 OF 2026 --------------------------------------------
Dated this the 29th day of January, 2026 ORDER The petitioners are the accused 1 to 6 in CC No.209/2023 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chittur, which has originated from Crime No.873/2022, registered by the Chittur Police Station, Palakkad, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 379 read with Section 34 and
201 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surksha Sanhita , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the respondents 3 and 4, who have executed Annexures C and D affidavits, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learne
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.