Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
VIJEESH.K.V. – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR DISTRICT – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 23070 OF 2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for timing adjustments. (Para 1) |
| 2. timings settled previously per law. (Para 2) |
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has filed the captioned writ petition seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 representation filed before the said respondent for the settlement of timings.
2. Smt.Sylaja S.L., the learned Government Pleader, on the basis of instructions received, submitted that the timings have already been settled pursuant to a duly convened timing conference, in accordance with the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act , 1988, after issuing notice to all affected operators, including K.S.R.T.C.
In the light of the afore, nothing further remains for consideration in this writ petition, and the same would stand closed as infructuous.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
