IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
ABDUL RAFEEQUE KAVUNGAL – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF BARODA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the debit freezing/lien of his Bank account with the Respondent/Bank at the requisition of the Police Authorities. The case of the Petitioner is that the Petitioner is not an accused in the Crime registered by the Police authorities against some other persons, in which the requisition was made; that the Petitioner is in no way connected with the said Crime; and that the debit freezing/lien of the account is in violation of Sections 106 & 107 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 ( BNSS )
and Article 300A of the Constitution of India.
2. The learned Counsel for the Respondent/Bank, after getting instructions from the Bank, confirmed that the Bank has received a Requisition from the Respondent No.3 for debit freezing of the account of the Petitioner mentioned in the Writ Petition, in which the transaction amount is stated as Rs.31,500/- and the disputed amount is stated as Rs.446.56. Ext.P3 also shows the same. Hence, I take the disputed amount of Rs.446.56 as the Requisition amount from the Respondent No.3 for debit freezing of the account of the Petitioner.
3. Since the frozen amount involved is only Rs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.