SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6977

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
MANAGER, IBRAHIM HAJI AUP SCHOOL KADAMPUZHA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 1414 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.A.FAYAZ, SMT.M.VISHNUPRIYA, SMT.C.B.ABHINAVA
For the Respondents: SRI.V. VENUGOPAL

Schools must be sanctioned divisions according to classroom availability according to government orders.

Headnote:Statute mandates that schools must be sanctioned adequate divisions based on their classrooms and student strength. The petitioner, managing AUP School Kadampuzha, challenged the refusal of additional divisions based on improper adherence to rules, demonstrating eligibility via sanctioned Fitness Certificates. The court highlighted the necessity of compliance with directions in the Government Order Ext.P5, ultimately ordering timely action for additional division sanctioning for the academic term. The judgment stressed that directives given must be executed within two months.

Table of Content
1. eligibility for additional school divisions based on classroom availability. (Para 1 , 2)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2026 / 9TH MAGHA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 1414 OF 2026 PETITIONER:

MANAGER, IBRAHIM HAJI AGED 78 YEARS AUP SCHOOL KADAMPUZHA, S/O.KUNJAHAMMEDKUTTY HAJI, RESIDING AT MAYYERI HOUSE, KALPAKAMCHERRI, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676555 BY ADVS.

SRI.M.A.FAYAZ SMT.M.VISHNUPRIYA SMT.C.B.ABHINAVA RESPONDENTS:

1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, ANNEX-II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

2 THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION O/O THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014

3 DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER O/O THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER TIRUR, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676101

4 ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER O/O THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER KUTTIPPURAM, MALAPPAURAM, PIN – 679571 BY ADV.

SRI.V. VENUGOPAL, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.01.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT Dated this the 29th day of January, 2026 Petitioner is the Manager of AUP School Kadampuzha, Malappuram. As per Ext.P2 Staff Fixation Order, the School was entitled for 21 divisions with three divisions each for classes 5 to 7. But, the 4th respondent sanctioned only 18 divisions and refused to recommend three additional divisions in spite of the eligibility on the ground that the School was only having 20 class rooms.

2. The School had 26 classrooms, but Fitness Certificates for only six classrooms were issued as per Ext.P3 on 12.09.2024, based on the challenge made before this Court. The stand taken by the 4th respondent was that since the Fitness Certificate was obtained after 31st August, it was required to be ratified by the Government.

3. The petitioner, therefore, approached the

1st respondent filing a Revision Petition, which was allowed, permitting the reckoning of the six new classrooms for the Academic Year 2024-2025. Accordingly, the 1st respondent directed the 2nd respondent to take necessary steps through the 4th respondent to ascertain the student strength and accommodation and to submit a recommendation for sanctioning additional divisions in accordance with Rule 12(4) of Chapter XXIII of the KER, as per Ext.P5 Government Order. However, despite the same, respondents 2 and 4 have not taken any steps to recommend additional divisions to the petitioner’s School for the Academic Year 2024-2025, despite there being sufficient student strength and accommodation.

4. The petitioner submitted that the

1st respondent had already sanctioned additional division for the Academic Year 2024-2025 as per Ext.P6 Government Order creating numerous posts in the Schools through out Kerala. The process for sanctioning of additional divisions for the Academic Year 2025-2026 is under way. In spite of the same, respondents 2 and 4 are refusing to take any steps to comply with Ext.P5 direction issued by the Government. There is little chance of the petitioner’s School getting the eligible divisions for the Academic Year 2024-2025. The Teachers appointed in eligible vacancies are denied approval and salary because of the delay in sanctioning of additional divisions, contends the petitioner.

5. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader representing the respondents.

6. It is evident from the pleadings that the

1st respondent, after hearing and adverting to Circular dated 15.11.2024, has directed to grant sanction to reckon the new class rooms for which Ext.P3 Fitness Certificate has been issued, to fix the staff strength of the School for the Academic Year 2024-2025 and to revise Ext.P2 Staff Fixation Order. The 1st respondent has directed the 2nd respondent to take steps to instruct the 4th respondent-Assistant Educational Officer to revise Ext.P2 Staff Fixation Or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top