SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6978

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
SASIKUMAR.S – Appellant
Versus
KERALA AUTOMOBILES LIMITED – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 39555 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.V.A.JOHNSON
For the Respondents: SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM, SMT.V.A. HARITHA

The court mandates prompt payment of terminal benefits with statutory interest despite financial constraints, emphasizing budgetary allocations.

Headnote:The petitioner, a retired employee seeking terminal benefits, was admitted liability by the first respondent. The court directed the respondent to pay the petitioner due amounts with interest within four months, referencing budgetary allocations for the payments. Findings emphasized the state's role in the respondent's funding. The final determination mandates prompt payment under existing financial constraints.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks terminal benefits. (Para 1)
2. respondents acknowledge liability but cite funding issues. (Para 2)
3. court directs payment based on budgetary allocations. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT Dated this the 29th day of January, 2026 The petitioner, who has retired from the service of the

1st respondent, is seeking release of terminal benefits with statutory interest.

2. The 1st respondent is admitting the liability.

However, it is stated that they do not have sufficient funds to pay and are dependent on the Government providing necessary funds.

3. The counsel for the petitioner has placed before me a letter issued by the Principal Secretary, wherein it is stated that a sum of ₹6 Crores has been allocated as budgetary allocation to the 1st respondent-Company for the purpose of effecting such payments.

Since the liability is not disputed, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to pay the amount due to the petitioner by way of terminal benefits along with statutory interest, in terms of the seniority of claims, at the earliest, at any rate, within four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

N.NAGARESH JUDGE spk APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 39555 OF 2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD OF THE PETITIONER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICE ORDER DATED

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top