SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6982

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
SIMI. G – Appellant
Versus
ARUN K.V – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ANSU VARGHESE, SRI.ARVIND AJAYKUMAR
For the Respondents: SRI.ARUN CHAND, SRI.M.SAKKIR HUSAIN, SRI.VINAYAK G MENON, SRI.THAREEQ ANVER, SRI.BHARAT VIJAY P., SMT.MINU VITTORRIA PAULSON, SMT.ARCHANA P.P., SMT.SHEHROON PATEL A.K.

ORDER

The petitioner is the wife and the respondent is the husband. Petitioner seeks transfer of OP(HMA) No.1926 of 2024 and OP No.989/2025 pending before the Family Court, Attingal to the Family Court, Punalur. The petitioner has stated that she is residing at Nettayam, Nediyara P.O. at Punalur 13 Kms away from the Family Court, Punalur and it will be convenient if the case is transferred to the Family Court, Punalur. It is also stated that the Family Court, Attingal is 60 Kms away from her residence and she will have to take several buses to reach the court. It is also stated that she does not have a job to look after the son. Even though the transfer is objected to by the respondent, I do not find any serious objection raised. The petitioner has made out sufficient reasons warranting a transfer.

In the above circumstances, the transfer petitions are allowed and OP(HMA) No.1926 of 2024 and OP No.989/2025 pending before the Family Court, Attingal stand transferred to the Family Court, Punalur.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top