IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
NOORJAHAN – Appellant
Versus
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Dated this the 27th day of January, 2026) The prayers in the writ petition are as follows;
“(i) call for the records related to Exhibit P1 to P4 and issue writ or any other direction to direct the respondents to provide time up to 31/03/2026 to remit the balance amount under One time settlement provided as per Exhibit P3.”
2. The petitioner along with her husband and son availed a loan from the 2nd respondent bank for an amount of Rs.35,00,000/-(Rupees thirty five lakhs only) in the year 2024. When there was default in repayment, the bank issued demand notice under the SARFAESI Act . The property mortgaged was a residential property. Therefore, the petitioner approached the bank to remit the amount under the one-time settlement scheme. The bank permitted the petitioner to settle the loan account under the one-time settlement.
3. As per Ext.P3 one-time settlement, petitioner was directed to remit Rs.45 lakhs as the one-time settlement dues. Taking note of the deposit of Rs.4 lakhs on 28.07.2025 the petitioner was instructed to pay an amount of Rs.16 lakhs on or before 16.09.2025, and the remaining 25 lakhs on or before 31.12.2025. The petitioner remitted only 4 lakhs and s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.