SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6992

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
AJAYAN KUMAR KRISHNAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
M/S HDFC BANK – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 44310 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.B.BALACHANDRAN
For the Respondents: SMT.S.AMBILY, SMT.RUPA R. NAIR, SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI (SR.)

Full payment of loan extinguishes bank's right to initiate further proceedings under SARFAESI Act.

Headnote:The legal matter revolves around a housing loan sanctioned under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act, which became a non-performing asset due to overdue installments. The appellant alleged wrong actions by the bank after loan irregularity. Upon clarification that the loan was fully paid, the court concluded no further adjudication was necessary. Resultantly, the writ petition is closed.

Table of Content
1. loan became a non-performing asset. (Para 1)
2. loan has been paid off. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

At the request of the petitioner and the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent Bank sanctioned a housing loan of ₹23,34,274/- (Rupees Twenty-Three Lakh Thirty-Four Thousand Two Hundred and Seventy-Four only) on 23.12.2013. The said loan was secured by creating a mortgage over immovable property having an extent of 2.43 Ares of land together with all improvements thereon, comprised in Re-Sy. Nos. 2927/1-3 and 2927/1 of Muttathara Village, Thiruvananthapuram Taluk. Owing to a slump in business and substantial expenses incurred towards the medical treatment of the 2nd respondent, the loan account became irregular and the petitioner could not remit the instalments promptly. Consequently, the respondent Bank classified the loan account as a Non-Performing Asset and initiated proceedings under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act . Aggrieved by the said proceedings, the petitioner has approached this Court.

2. When the matter was taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the entire amount due to the Bank has been remitted and, consequently, the loan account stands closed.

In view of the above, there is no further dispute requiring adjudication, and accordingly, this writ petition is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top