SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6998

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
ROYALBISON AUTORENTALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE TAX OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 46966 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.TELMA RAJU, SHRI.P.K.BIJU
For the Respondents: SHRI.ALAN PRIYADARSHI DEV, G.P

The timely submission of returns under Sec.16(5) allows taxpayers to qualify for input tax credit despite unmet deadlines specified in Sec.16(4).

Headnote:This judgment examines the applicability of Sec.16(5) of the CGST Act concerning the denial of input tax credit for the year 2019-2020. The petitioner contended that timely submission of returns allows for claiming input tax credit despite not meeting deadlines stated in Sec.16(4). The court found that when returns are submitted by the specified cutoff date, prior timelines lose relevance, confirming the petitioner's entitlement to input tax credit under Sec.16(5). The court ordered the reconsideration of the input tax credit application by the respondent while ensuring a hearing for the petitioner.

Table of Content
1. petitioner submits input tax credit application based on cgst act provisions. (Para 1)
2. court underscores importance of timely filed returns under cgst. (Para 2)

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is an assessee under the provisions of CGST/SGST Act 2017. The grievance highlighted by the petitioner is against the denial of input tax credit claimed by the petitioner pertaining to the year 2019-2020 on the reason that, the petitioner failed to submit the return for the month of March 2020 within in the period stipulated under Sec.16(4) of the CGST Act . Ext.P4 is the order passed under Sec.73 of the CGST Act . The challenge is raised against Ext.P4 order mainly on the ground that, by virtue of Sec.16(5) of the CGST Act , which is newly introduced, the petitioner is entitled to claim the input tax credit, in view of the fact that the petitioner submitted the return for the month of March 2020 on 24.10.2020, which is within the cutoff date contemplated under Sec.16(5) of the Act, i.e, 30.11.2021.

2. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, I find merits in the said submission. In Ext.P4 order itself, it is specifically recorded that the petitioner submitted the returns for the month of March 2020 in GSTR 3B on 24.10.2020. As per Sec.16(5), a tax payer who submits return on or before 30.11.2021 shall be entitled to avail input tax credit covered by the same. Moreover, Sec.16(5) starts with the wordings “Notwithstanding anything contained in Sub Sec.4" and this would mean that, once the returns are filed within the statutory period contemplated under Sec.16(5), the timeline contemplated under Sec.16(4) losses its significance. Therefore, an interference is required as the petitioner is entitled to get input tax credit in the Sec.16(5).

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, quashing Ext.P4 with a direction to the 1st respondent to reconsider the matter and grant the benefits under Sec.16(5) of the CGST Act , if the petitioner is otherwise entitled to the same. Necessary orders in this regard shall be passed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top