SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 7006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
VICTORIA PAUL – Appellant
Versus
L & T FINANCE LIMITED – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 39888 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.M. MUHAMMED HUSSAIN
For the Respondents: MAITREYI SACHIDANANDA HEGDE, ANJALI ANIL A., RADHIKA PRASAD

The appropriate remedy for loan recovery disputes lies with the Debts Recovery Tribunal under the SARFAESI Act.

Headnote:The petitioner sought recovery of possession of a secured asset after defaulting on a housing loan. The Court referenced the SARFAESI Act and indicated the proper legal remedy was to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal, citing a relevant Supreme Court decision. Ultimately, the writ petition was dismissed.

Table of Content
1. court outlines petitioner's loan default and remedies. (Para 1 , 2)

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 23rd day of January, 2026)

The petitioner and her son availed housing loan for an amount of Rs.18 lakhs from the 2nd respondent bank. When default occurred in repayment, the respondent initiated recovery proceedings and physical possession of the secured asset was taken on 11.09.2025 pursuant to proceedings before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate. Though the petitioner attempted to remit substantial amounts, including Rs.2,50,000/-, the same was not accepted. The petitioner is willing to clear the overdue amount in instalments and seeks permission to remit the arrears in 15 monthly instalments and for restoration of possession of the secured asset.

2. On 16.12.2025, this Court granted an interim order directing the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- within a period of one month. Today, when the case is taken for consideration, it is submitted that the said direction has not been complied with.

In such circumstances, the remedy available to the petitioner is to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act , in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court inSouth Indian Bank Ltd v. Naveen Mathew Philip [(2023) 17 SCC 311] .

The writ petition is dismissed accordingly.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top