Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
VRINDHA BABU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to quash the cancellation of admission. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. counter affidavit details the cancellation reasons and responses. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court considers the unfortunate situation of the petitioner. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court refuses to create additional seats. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. petition dismissed; court emphasizes legal remedies available. (Para 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioner seeks for a direction to quash Ext.P7, Ext.P8 and Ext.P9 orders to the extent it cancelled her allotment of admission for the course Bachelor of Physiotherapy (BPT) at the Government Medical College, Kottayam. Petitioner also seeks for a declaration that she is entitled for admission to the BPT course at the aforenoted college and to restore her allotment and admission.
2. The circumstances arising in the instant case is rather unfortunate. Petitioner had initially obtained admission in the School of Medical Education, Kottayam (for short SME). After she took admission at SME, she was informed that she had been allotted BPT course at the Government Medical College, Kottayam also, as allotment No.23. Hence she withdrew her secured admission at SME and participated in the allotment for
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
