Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SATHISH NINAN, P. KRISHNA KUMAR, JJ
SHAHINA – Appellant
Versus
THANSEER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. marriage solemnized; claim for gold and money raised. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. family court's dismissal of the original petition. (Para 4) |
| 3. evidence supporting wife's claim of gold ornaments. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. wife entitled to mahar as per statutory provisions. (Para 8) |
| 5. denial of money claim due to lack of evidence. (Para 9) |
| 6. final decree for the return of mahar. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT
Sathish Ninan, J.
The original petition filed by the wife against the husband, seeking return of gold and money, was dismissed by the Family Court. The wife is in appeal.
2. The marriage between the parties was solemnised on 28.09.2012. The husband was abroad during that time. After the marriage, the wife was taken to the matrimonial home on 14.09.2013. It is the claim of the wife that, before she was taken to the matrimonial home, her parents provided her with 25 sovereigns of gold ornaments and Rs.2,00,000/-. The gold and money were misappropriated by the husband for investing in the business at abroad. The parties fell apart. Accordingly, the original petition was filed for return of gold and money.
3. The respondent contended that, at the time of marriage the petitioner had only 15 sovereig
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
