SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 7165

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SATHISH NINAN, P. KRISHNA KUMAR, JJ
JYOTHI E.K – Appellant
Versus
RAMACHANDRAN P.K – Respondent
Mat.Appeal No. 20 of 2016 | OP No. 237 of 2006



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.GOPAKUMAR, SMT.T.M.BINITHA
For the Respondents: SMT.DHANYA P.ASHOKAN (SR.), SRI.M.R.VENUGOPAL

Unfounded allegations can constitute mental cruelty, validating divorce.

Headnote:This judgment analyses the decree for divorce on grounds of mental cruelty. The court observed that the husband alleged unfounded accusations against the respondent without evidence. The Family Court's findings were upheld, affirming the decree of divorce due to the spouse's unfounded allegations constituting mental cruelty. The appeal was dismissed as the Family Court's decree was deemed lawful.

Table of Content
1. allegations of cruelty. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. court's rationale on appeal. (Para 6)

Sathish Ninan, J.

The decree for divorce granted at the instance of the husband, alleging mental cruelty, is under challenge in this appeal by the wife.

2. The marriage between the parties was solemnised on 08.02.1997. The allegation of the husband is that the wife is making false and unfounded allegation of he having an adulterous life.

3. In the counter affidavit filed by the wife, she affirmed her allegations.

4. The Family Court granted divorce on the ground of cruelty.

5. We have heard the learned counsel on either side.

Mat.Appeal No.20 of 2016

6. Though wild allegations that the petitioner is having illicit relationships were made, no attempt was made by the respondent to prove the same. The respondent even went to the extent of alleging that the petitioner is having illicit relationship with his own sister-in-law. No evidence is adduced by her to substantiate the allegations. Making such unfounded allegations by itself amounts to mental cruelty. It is sufficient enough to grant a decree of divorce. The Family Court was right in having granted a decree of divorce. There is no reason to interfere with the finding of the Family Court.

Resultantly, the appeal fails and is dismissed. No costs.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top