SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 7180

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Soumen Sen, CJ, Syam Kumar V.M., J
THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 501 – Appellant
Versus
ANANDA PADMANABHAN AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.N. VISWANATHAN NAIR, RESIDING AT 6D, ECO PARADISE, STADIUM LINK ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI, PIN – 682 018 – Respondent
RP NO. 1238 OF 2024 | WP(C) NO.15166 OF 2024



The Court reaffirmed that costs imposed for procedural negligence are not appealable and serve to discourage future lapses.

Headnote:The review petition under RP No. 1238 of 2024 arises against the order dated in WP

(C) No.15166 of 2024 where the Court addressed the imposition of costs due to procedural lapses, emphasizing the necessity to deter negligence. The Court found no apparent error and extended the payment timeline for costs to the Kerala State Legal Services Authority. The review petition was ultimately dismissed.

Table of Content
1. ground c reveals counsel’s error. (Para 1)
2. no clear error found in costs ruling. (Para 2)
3. review petition concluded with dismissal. (Para 3)

ORDER Dated this the 4th day of February, 2026 Soumen Sen , C.J .

The learned Government Pleader for the review petitioners has submitted that Ground C of the review petition would disclose that it is a mistake of the counsel and that the imposition of the costs may be waived.

2. It appears that the costs have been imposed after repeated opportunities were given to file a counter affidavit. The earlier Bench has considered the matter and has given reasons. We do not find an error apparent on the face of the order. Moreover, the said order will ensure that in future such negligent act is not repeated. We find that the costs imposed are not payable to any party, but payable for a good cause. On such consideration, we are not inclined to review the order under challenge. However time to pay costs before the Kerala State Legal Services Authority is extended by one week from today.

3. The review petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top