IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
...... – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. juvenile petition for quashing proceedings (Para 1) |
| 2. settlement between parties (Para 2 , 3) |
O R D E R Dated this the 3rd day of February, 2026 A juvenile in conflict with law involved in ST.No.41/2024 pending before the Juvenile Justice Board, Palakkad, arising out of Crime No.1033/2023 of Vadakkancherry Police Station, Palakkad, filed this petition under Section 5 28 of the BNSS praying for quashing all further proceedings against him. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 3 77 of IPC , Sections 4 r/w 3(a), 6 r/w 5(l), 5(m), 5(n) of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, now the entire dispute between the petitioner and the defacto complainant is settled. Therefore, he prayed for quashing all further proceedings against the petitioner.
3. The learned Counsel for the 2ndrespondent/defacto complainant also submitted that the dispute between the defacto complainant and the 4. Since the offences involved int his case includesSection 377IPC and , 4, 5, and 6 of the POCSO Act, which are serious and heinous in nature, the prayer for quashing the proceedings against the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.