JUDGMENT Devan Ramachandran, J.

We had, on 30.01.2026, passed the following order:

The “alleged detenue” was produced before us by the 1 st respondent.

2. The petitioner and the 1st respondent are husband and wife; however, they are estranged and pursuing litigation for divorce.

3. The “alleged detenue' is a young boy of seven years, very articulate and showing equal affection to both parents. He, however, has been with the 1st respondent for some time and therefore, showed some preference to him; but agreed that he can be with the mother also, provided his father accompanies them.

4. Indubitably, the parties are in quarrel for reasons that are not attributable, or known to the 'alleged detenue”. He is, unfortunately, caught in the crossfire. However, he requires both his parents, to grow up as a worthy citizen.

5. We notice that the petitioner had obtained Ext.P4 judgment, wherein she has been granted custody of the child; however, that it was delivered ex parte. It is stated before us by the 1st respondent that the said judgment has now been set aside and his learned Counsel offered to place