IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
T.KUMARAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
SHO KASARAGOD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction upheld for inflicting injuries under different ipc section. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. evidentiary gaps led to a reevaluation of the liability. (Para 3) |
ORDER
The petitioner suffered the concurrent conviction for the commission of the offence under Section 324 IPC from the Trial Court and the Appellate Court. The allegation against him in C.C.No.703 of 2003 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kasaragod, was that he committed the offence under by hitting PW1 with an iron rod at about 9.15 am on 17.01.2003. As a result of the aforesaid assault, PW1 is said to have sustained injuries upon his forearm and scalp. The learned Magistrate by the judgment rendered on 25.10.2005, convicted the petitioner for the offence under and sentenced him to undergo Simple Imprisonment for one year and to pay fine Rs.1,000/-. The Sessions Court, Kasaragod, in Crl.A.No.315 of 2005, confirmed the above conviction, but reduced the sentence to Simple Imprisonment for three months and fine Rs.2,000/-. It is aggrieved by the above verdict of the courts below that the petitioner is here before this Court with this revision.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the peti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.