Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
P.NANU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. defendant's challenge to conviction under ipc. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. prosecutor's argument and court considerations. (Para 5) |
| 3. court upheld acquittal due to lack of meritorious grounds. (Para 6 , 9) |
| 4. jurisdiction limitations on high court's review capabilities. (Para 8) |
ORDER
The defacto complainant / PW2 in C.C.No.125 of 1996 on the files of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thalassery, has filed this revision petition challenging the common judgment rendered by the Sessions Court, Thalassery, setting aside the conviction and sentence of the accused in the aforesaid case by the Trial Court and ordering their acquittal.
2. The allegation against the accused was that they collected money from the defacto complainant, offering a visa for employment abroad, and failed to arrange the visa as promised. It is the further grievance of the defacto complainant that the amount collected from him was not returned by the accused. Thus the criminal prosecution was launched against the accused in Crime No.189 of 1993 of Panur Police Station, for the commission of the offence under Section 420 read with Section 34 IPC .
3. After analysing the evidence adduced by the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
