Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 7243

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
RASAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 10633 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF, SHRI.NITHIN A.R.
For the Respondents: SHRI.A.JANI(KOLLAM)

A writ petition can be dismissed for non-prosecution if the petitioner fails to represent their case.

Headnote:The petitioner sought adjournments on 13.01.2026 and 29.01.2026 but failed to appear when the writ petition was taken up for hearing. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution, emphasizing the need for parties to be present during proceedings.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has sought for adjournment on 13.01.2026 and on 29.01.2026.

Today, when the matter is taken up, there is no representation from the side of the petitioner. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 7243

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMHARISANKAR V. MENON, JRASAK – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 10633 OF 2023

A writ petition can be dismissed for non-prosecution if the petitioner fails to represent their case.

Headnote:The petitioner sought adjournments on 13.01.2026 and 29.01.2026 but failed to appear when the writ petition was taken up for hearing. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution, emphasizing the need for parties to be present during proceedings.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
RASAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 10633 OF 2023