SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 7243

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
RASAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 10633 OF 2023



Important Points

A writ petition can be dismissed for non-prosecution if the petitioner fails to represent their case.

Subject

Civil - Writ Petition

Headnote

The petitioner sought adjournments on 13.01.2026 and 29.01.2026 but failed to appear when the writ petition was taken up for hearing. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution, emphasizing the need for parties to be present during proceedings.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF, SHRI.NITHIN A.R.
For the Respondents: SHRI.A.JANI(KOLLAM)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has sought for adjournment on 13.01.2026 and on 29.01.2026.

Today, when the matter is taken up, there is no representation from the side of the petitioner. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.

Sd/-

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top