Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
RAHMATH BEEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. property classified as 'purayidam' is subject to conservation regulations. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments for reconsideration rely on evidence overlooked by the authorities. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's directive for reconsideration emphasizes adherence to precedents. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“i) to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction, quashing Exhibit P4 stop memo and Exhibit P6 order passed by the respondents.
ii) to grant such other order or direction as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper to grant.” (SIC)
2. The petitioner obtained an extent of 8.92 Ares of property in Re.Sy. No.86/3 of Block No.4 in Oachira Village by virtue of Sale Deed No.678/1986 of Oachira SRO is the submission. By virtue of Ext.P1, the petitioner obtained a total of 54 cents of property along with ‘vadavuvasi’. Out of the said property, some portion of the properties were disposed and the property that remain unsold which is in the exclusive ownership and possession of the petitioner is 8.92 Ares. The petitioner is paying land tax for the said property and in all the revenue records, the property is described
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
