Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
HIMTA RAM – Appellant
Versus
KOZHIKODE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek permit for building. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. legal provisions support petitioners' claims. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court emphasizes entitlement under statutory law. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court orders reconsideration of permit application. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing respondents No. 1 to 3 to issue permit to the petitioners as sought for by them, which is the subject matter Ext. P1, as expeditiously as possible;
ii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing to 2nd respondent to consider pass orders on Ext.P2 as expeditiously as possible also keeping in mind the law declared by this Hon’ble Court in District Town Planner, Thrissur Vs. Joby.M.C and others ( 2020 (6) KHC 455 ), and Pradeep Kumar. P.B and others Vs. Marad Municipality and others (2022(3) KHC 253);
iii) issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records leading to Ext.P1 and to quash the original of the same;
iii(a) To call for the records leading to Ext.P3 and to quash the original of th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
