IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
L. SUKESINI – Appellant
Versus
KOCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The limited prayer sought for by the petitioner is for a direction to consider Ext.P1 representation in a time-bound manner. By Ext.P1 complaint, the petitioner alleges that respondents 4 and 5 had constructed a flex board on the compound wall of the petitioner, causing hindrance to the free flow of air and sunlight.
2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondents, I am of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of dispensing with notice to respondents 4 and 5, considering the nature of the order that is proposed to be issued.
3. Since Ext.P1 complaint has already been filed and is pending consideration, it can be directed to be disposed of.
Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent/Competent Officer to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P1, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after issuing notice and granting an opportunity of hearing to respondents 4 and 5 as well as the petitioner.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.