Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 7386

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
C.N.RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 17994 OF 2018

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri.Biju Hariharan, Sri.R.B.Balachandran, Sri.P.Haridas, Sri.Renji George Cherian, Sri.Rishikesh Haridas, Sri.P.C.Shijin
For the Respondents: None

Dismissal of a petition as not pressed reflects judicial efficiency when a party withdraws their application.

Headnote:The petitioners sought relief but later opted not to pursue their writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed, adhering to procedural guidelines and demonstrating judicial efficiency. The dismissal effectively concluded the matter without adverse findings on the merits of the petition.

J U D G M E N T Dated this the 31^st day of January, 2026 Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this writ petition is not pressed. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 7386

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC.PRATHEEP KUMAR, JC.N.RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 17994 OF 2018

Dismissal of a petition as not pressed reflects judicial efficiency when a party withdraws their application.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
C.N.RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 17994 OF 2018