SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 7394

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
NEDUMANGAD GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD – Appellant
Versus
JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 3535 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.J.SAJI ISAAC, DR.ELIZABETH VARKEY, SRI.JITHIN SAJI ISAAC, SRI.ABHISHEK S. KUMAR, SRI.JOSHUA SEBASTIAN
For the Respondents: ADV. RESMI THOMAS (GP)

Objections to enquiry orders under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act can only be raised after issuance of a show cause notice.

Headnote:This writ petition challenges an order directing an enquiry under Section 65 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The petitioner contends the order is flawed, yet the court emphasizes, referencing notable jurisprudence, that objections can only be raised post issuance of a show cause notice. The court therefore dismisses the petition while preserving the rights to contest upon the issuance of such notices.

Table of Content
1. petition challenges enquiry order. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner alleges legal errors. (Para 3)
3. court reiterates objection timing rules. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

This writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P1 order directing an enquiry under Section 65 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act , 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘1969 Act’) into the affairs of the Nedumangad Government Employees Housing Co-operative Society Ltd.

2. The learned Government Pleader submits that the petitioner cannot have any grievance against Ext.P1 order and that, going by the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in Kudayathoor Service Co-operative Bank Limited v. Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies (General), 2022 (3) KLT 222 (FB), the petitioner has to raise all contentions at the stage when a show cause notice is issued in terms of the provisions contained in Section 32 or Section 68 of the 1969 Act.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that Ext.P1 order is vitiated by various errors of law and fact.

4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, I am of the view that, in the light of the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in Kudayathoor Service Co-operative Bank Limited (supra), the right of the petitioner to raise objections is postponed to the stage at which a show cause notice is issued to the members of the Managing Committee or any other officer of the Society, on the basis of any findings that may be entered against them in an enquiry under Section 65 of the 1969 Act, namely, at the stage at which a show cause notice under Section 32 or Section 68 of the 1969 Act is issued to them.

Therefore, leaving open the right of the persons against whom any show cause notice may be issued either under the provisions of Section 32 or Section 68 of the 1969 Act, and leaving open all contentions raised in this writ petition, the challenge raised at this stage to Ext.P1 order is rejected, and the writ petition will stand dismissed, subject to the above observations.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top