Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
JOY THEKKEDATH – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's challenge to the order concerning property ownership. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's observations about unsubstantiated claims of fraudulent property transfer. (Para 3) |
| 3. modification of the order to remove unfounded claims. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 31st day of January, 2026 The petitioner, who is the son of the 3rd respondent herein, has filed the captioned writ petition seeking to challenge Ext.P1 order issued by the 2nd respondent herein, to the limited extend to striking down certain observations contained in the afore order.
2. The 3rd respondent herein-the petitioner's father-
submitted an application before the 2nd respondent under the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act , 2007, (hereinafter referred to as (‘Act’) essentially contending that he is not being properly looked after. He also contended that the petitioner obtained the property and residential building originally owned by him through ‘fraudulent means’ by the settlement deed at Ext.P4. The 2nd respondent herein considered the afore application and issued the order at Ext.P1. The 2nd respondent noticed that the 3rd respondent-father only wanted
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
