SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 7396

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
EYAS M A – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE POLICE CHIEF – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 24926 OF 2023 | WP(C) NO. 21330 OF 2023 | WP(C) NO. 7935 OF 2023 | WP(C) NO. 16538 OF 2023 | WP(C) NO. 23940 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.RAJU JOSEPH
SRI.G.KIRAN, SRI.R.KISHORE (KALLUMTHAZHAM)
SRI.R.RANJITH, SRI.A.P.NIDHIN KUMAR
SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR, SHRI.AKASH S., SHRI.GIRISH KUMAR M S, SMT.DEVIKA JAYARAJ
KUM.GAYATHRI MURALEEDHARAN
For the Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.PREMCHAND M., SHRI.MOHAN JACOB GEORGE, SMT.P.V.PARVATHY, SMT.REENA THOMAS, SMT.NIGI GEORGE, SHRI.ANANTHU V.LAL
SRI.T.G.PAUL, SHRI.GEORGE JAMES VATTATHARA, SHRI.P.N.ANOOP (PAREKKADAN)

The court reaffirmed that banks can freeze accounts suspecting unauthorized transactions but must do so within a stipulated period without need for prior notice.

Headnote:Writ petitions challenging the freezing of bank accounts are addressed, referencing previous rulings that allow banks to freeze accounts without notice, under certain conditions. The court emphasizes the need to dispose of the petitions expeditiously due to prolonged pending status, concluding with the order to dispose petitions per interim orders.

Table of Content
1. challenges to bank account freezes (Para 1)
2. court's prior rulings on bank actions (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

W.P.(C) Nos.24926, 21330, 7935, 16538 and 23940 of 2023 These writ petitions have been filed seeking to challenge the freezing of bank accounts of the respective petitioners by the respondents herein, on the basis of certain directives issued by the police authorities/Government authorities.

2. A learned Single Judge of this Court, in Abdul Azees v. Union of India [2025 (7) KHC 308] has held that though the Banks can effect debit freeze, even without issuing any notice to the account holder, in a situation where the Bank could suspect the transaction in the accounts, such freezing could be continued only for a period of three months. Certain directives were also issued by this Court in the afore judgment.

I am of the opinion that the directions issued by this Court would apply to the facts and circumstances of this case also. Insofar as these writ petitions have been pending for almost three years and no further steps seems to have been taken in the matter, I am of the opinion that these writ petitions can be disposed of, in terms of the interim orders issued by this Court as above. These writ petitions are disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top