SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 7397

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
RAJESH M.R. – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 13333 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: DR.V.N.SANKARJEE, SRI.V.N.MADHUSUDANAN, SMT.R.UDAYA JYOTHI, SRI.M.M.VINOD, SMT.M.SUSEELA, SMT. KEERTHI B. CHANDRAN, SRI.VIJAYAN PILLAI P.K., SRI.C.PURUSHOTHAMAN NAIR
For the Respondents: SRI.C.K.SAJEEV, SRI.N.B.SUNIL NATH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The judgment underscores the necessity of compliance with licensing for ferry services across water bodies.

Headnote:The judgment addresses the issuance of a writ mandamus under relevant legal stipulations. The petitioner seeks to direct the respondents to ensure ferry services comply with licensing regulations, specifically preventing illegal services. The Court emphasizes adherence to these mandatory requirements as critical. The primary issue revolves around the legitimacy of ferry operations across Vembanadu Backwaters. The Court finds that the services must follow statutory obligations as detailed in the order. Consequently, the petition is disposed of, affirming the interim order's validity from 12.04.2023.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's relief sought for ferry service compliance. (Para 1)
2. court's interim order and adherence to licensing emphasized. (Para 2 , 3)

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has filed the captioned writ petition, seeking the following reliefs;

“(i) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing respondents 1 to 6 to conduct ferry service across Vembanadu Backwaters, in between Makkekadavu in Cherthala Taluk, Alappuzha District and Nerekadavu in Vaikom Taluk, Kottayam District only with vessels having valid licence, permit, insurance and such other necessary requirements;

(ii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing respondents 1 to 6 to prevent the 7th respondent from conducting ferry service across Vembanadu Backwaters, in between Makkekadavu in Cherthala Taluk, Alappuzha District and Nerekadavu in Vaikom Taluk, Kottayam District by employing vessel bearing No. KIV/ALP /CV/1480/15 which is having no valid licence, permit, insurance and such other necessary requirements.”

2. While admitting the writ petition on 12.04.2023, this Court had directed the Kerala Maritime Board to ensure that the ferry services are conducted by the Panchayat, adhering to the licences and clearances required from the statutory authorities.

3. In view of the interim order passed as above, and taking into account the averments contained in the writ petition, I am of the opinion that this writ petition can be disposed of in terms of the interim order referred to as above.

Accordingly, this writ petition would stand disposed of, making the interim order dated 12.04.2023 absolute.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top