SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 7408

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
ROYAL TRAVANCORE NIDHI LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 24988 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.FRANKLIN ARACKAL, SRI.I.J.AUGUSTINE, KUM.NEETHU SOMAN
For the Respondents: SMT.O.M.SHALINA, SRI.T.S.JIBU

Writ petitions must align with established precedents, upholding compliance with statutory regulations.

Headnote:In this writ petition concerning statutory regulations, the Court addressed the previously decided case involving Nidhi companies. The petitioner sought relief based on precedents set in earlier judgments, specifically addressing regulatory compliance as per the Nidhi (Amendment) Rules, 2022. Ultimately, the Court disposed of the writ petition aligning with prior judicial determinations, asserting adherence to the established legal framework.

J U D G M E N T

The issue involved in this writ petition has already been considered and decided by a learned Single Judge of this Court in Annamanada Gramakshemam Nidhi Limited v. Union of India [2024 (3) KHC 429]

In the light of the above, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment referred to above.

Sd/-

HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top