Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
SABRY ABDUL RAZAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. discussion on land ownership and classification. (Para 1) |
| 2. counsel's arguments regarding paddy land classification. (Para 2) |
| 3. court's findings based on prior case law. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is stated to be the absolute owner in possession of an extent of 4.5 Ares of land in Survey No.86/1-41 of Pattambi Village in Palakkad District. The petitioner states that the afore referred property came to be included in the data bank as a Paddy land, incorrectly. Therefore, an application in Form 5 for removing the property from the data bank was instituted before the 3rd respondent herein. By the impugned order at Ext.P5, the prayer of the petitioner came to be rejected solely for the reason that the property does not appear to have been converted earlier to the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetlands Act , 2008 with reference to the report of the KSREC.
2. Heard Sri.Ashwin Sunilkumar representing Sri.Avaneesh Koyikkara, the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as Sri.Jibu, the learned Government Pleader.
3. This Court on a perusal of Ext.P6, notices that it was only during the year 1967 the property was observed as paddy land. As regards the year
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
